The gun control debate that is coming back out of
hibernation as a result of last week’s tragedy is an interesting case in point
from the perspective of a couples therapist. So much of the trouble I encounter
in the therapy room is due to partners addressing the issue on their own mind
instead of the issue on the other’s mind.
John is angry about Marsha’s spending habits; Marsha feels unloved; and
neither one is speaking to the problem that the other sees.
So too in the argument over gun control. The loudest piece of the debate goes like
this: proponents cry for safety and protection for our youth. Opponents point to the second amendment. Proponents insist something needs to be done
before more children are killed. Opponents
point to the second amendment. It is but
two ships passing in the night. People
who are desperate to save children’s lives don’t much care for the supposed
freedom to carry big, scary assault weapons.
People who cling to the right to bear arms don’t seem to have much to
say about children’s safety. And so the
debate hobbles on, neither side addressing the concerns of the other.
Of course, there are those who oppose gun control because
they believe some of the laws being pushed will actually lead to more violence. There are those who support some gun laws
without suggesting that trying to outlaw guns in general is a good idea. But those voices, unfortunately, are the
quiet ones. Instead of meaningful
dialogue between sincere people who want to make the world a better place, we
have large-scale shouting matches between extremists on both sides.
If John could speak to Marsha’s fears and Marsha could
address John’s financial concerns, they would likely see a lot of
progress. That’s often an important part
of the work I do with couples. Now if
only I could get the pro- and anti-gun control groups in a room together…